What Would You Do? (Cultural Movements and basic archaeology)

Overview: In this lesson students will recognize an archaeological feature (the Shell Midden), and consider what would have happened when the earthquake, evidenced in the fault, forced abandonment of the site. Students will also make inferences as to what life might have been like before, during, and after the earthquake event and compare local myth(s).

Key goals and objectives: SWBAT recognize an archaeological site (the shell midden), and correlate abandonment with a 23-foot rise in sea level because of the mega-thrust shallow earthquake 1100 ybp. SWBAT infer what the people may have been doing with the land, and how they may have been living.


Introduction and Activity: You remember how the fault we were just looking at showed evidence of an earthquake that raised the ground surface. Well, down here along the harbor we have more evidence of the earthquake. First we have evidence of how it affected the people living here at the time, and later, when we walk to the harbor, we will see further evidence of uplifted ground surfaces.

The core lesson:
Part 1 (at the shell midden): Do you see any evidence of people here? What kinds of things do you think you would find? Write at least 5 things. How would you know when you found anything? Remember the earthquake was 1100 years ago. [Share some of the items out loud, which may include, but not limited to, stone, bone, or wood tools; faunal remains, shell remains, building structures; clothing; flora remains; hearths; etc.]
Here along the trail there is evidence of a Native American fish camp, the one mentioned in the Blakely Harbor Video, can you find it? I’ll give you a hint, look for objects that you wouldn’t expect to find in the forest…
Did anyone see the shells? [Go over to the shell midden and brush away some of the dirt to expose the shells.] How far away do you think the ocean is?
Now, I want everyone to draw what they think the fish camp would have looked like before the earthquake, then when you have finished your drawing I want you to answer the question, “What would you do?” How did this event change how you got your food, where you got your food from, and whether or not you stayed? Did the earthquake destroy their houses?
Part 2 (at the exposed natural shell deposit at the Country Club Rd. culvert (east side of street, please see image below), and at the head of the estuary or the mill complex, where you can see Restoration Point and explain the raised tidal flats):
The flat area in front of the fish camp, and the field that we just crossed to get here was all once a tidal flat, just like you see in front of us. The wall that we just looked at shows the shells in place that were displaced by the earthquake. The 23 foot rise in sea happened suddenly and the tides have been filling that distance ever since. Can you see how much the earthquake caused the ground to uplift?
Where would you have gone, if an earthquake lifted your home and destroyed your feeding area? Write your ideas in your journal.

Conclusion: The mea-earthquake 1100 years ago raised the ground surface about 23 feet (7 meters), and directly affected the Native Americans living along the seashore. Because their camp was no longer adjacent to the tidal flats, they were forced to move to another location.
Part 1 and Part 2: facilitate a fish bowl discussion around the question:
What would you do if such an earthquake occurred? Do you think that your house would survive the shaking? What kinds of things should you have in the construction of your house to make it safer?
Compare some of the student's stories with local myths and legends about earthquakes (Ludwin 2002).

Assessment: Built-in to the experience or based on a follow-up. Check for understanding of how the ground shifted at the estuary, where you can see the uplift on Restoration Point. Have the students share what they would do if an earthquake affected their home, as it did to the Native Americans at the shell midden.

Extension: Artifact analysis— students should choose a tangible object that is important to them, their family, heritage, culture, ethnicity, or personal use. They will draw, describe, explain, and analyze the object as an archaeologist would (see attached “Artifact Analysis” below and on learn.IslandWood.org). Then students should switch objects, and repeat with someone else’s. Compare what information was lost in the second attempt. Did it lose any meaning in the retelling?
Explain that this is the process of archaeology — to make assumptions about past cultures, ethnicities, and uses based upon a single tangible item found during excavation.
For more information on the method of archaeology consult the methods page.


Safety Considerations: There are no immediate safety issues, except to cross the street to the Harbor.
Cultural sensitivity issues may arise if a Native American student is present, or when presenting how people used to live. It is important to note that the practice of archaeology (the method) makes assumptions about the way past peoples lived based upon the debitage (both naturally and culturally modified). It is also important to note that even though a shell midden is often associated with trash that may have been left behind, it may also have been an occupied living site — it cannot be referred to as a simple site for refuge.

Alternative Conceptions

Background Information: see the cultural page.

References: see the citations page.

Created by Matthew John Brewer on November 23, 2003, modified on March 8, 2004.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Theme: shell midden, Native American people, and archaeology.

Concepts: relative time, quantification, order, and scale

Skills: observation, infer, correlation, analyze,

Age group: 12- 97

Venue/s: at the shell midden (approx. 100 yards before the honey bucket), Country Club Rd. culvert (exposed sea wall with natural shell deposit), and Blakely Harbor (the head of the estuary to see Restoration Point)

Materials: ArchaeologicalSites.pdf, pencil and paper,

Time: Part 1 45 minutes, 10 minutes between parts (walking to venue), and Part 2 45 minutes

Set up: none

 


These pages were created by Matthew John Brewer on March 23, 2004 as part of the Graduate Program at IslandWood and fulfillment of the Independent Study Project. Last updated on May 18, 2004.

To contact the webmaster or to find out more about IslandWood you should go to the contact us web page.

 

HOME | NATURAL LANDSCAPES | CULTURAL LANDSCAPES | CREATED LANDSCAPES | RESOURCES | LESSONS | CITATIONS | CONTACT US